Why should I switch litespeed to caddy
Used for a while litespeed commercial version
The commercial version of litespeed is really powerful and it's not difficult to configure
But finally after testing against caddy, it was decided to switch the server to caddy
In the same context as architecture, network, program, system environment
Test found caddy response faster than litespeed for about 2 seconds.
Caddy also supports the latest quic protocol
Although functionally no litespeed powerful
But overall, the web server is enough.
💘 相关文章
- 我为什么要把litespeed切换成caddy
- caddy httpserver.ResponseWriterWrapper is not a closeNotifier answer
- 重设litespeed的web管理密码
- openlitespeed/litespeed禁止访问文件夹和文件的方法
- Openlitespeed /litespeed deny methods to access folders and files
- 这应该是最全的Litespeed的教程了
- 不知道是不是错觉,感觉caddy 比nginx快
- caddy httpserver.ResponseWriterWrapper is not a closeNotifier的解決方法
- 使用301实现域名跳转到www包括https的3种方法
- how to Reset litespeed web management password