
Why should I switch litespeed to caddy
Used for a while litespeed commercial version
The commercial version of litespeed is really powerful and it's not difficult to configure
But finally after testing against caddy, it was decided to switch the server to caddy
In the same context as architecture, network, program, system environment
Test found caddy response faster than litespeed for about 2 seconds.
Caddy also supports the latest quic protocol
Although functionally no litespeed powerful
But overall, the web server is enough.
💘 相关文章
- 我为什么要把litespeed切换成caddy
- how to Reset litespeed web management password
- openlitespeed/litespeed禁止访问文件夹和文件的方法
- Openlitespeed /litespeed 添加HSTS的方法
- caddy httpserver.ResponseWriterWrapper is not a closeNotifier的解決方法
- 使用301实现域名跳转到www包括https的3种方法
- LiteSpeed 旗下特色的免费CDN加速服务QUIC.cloud
- 这应该是最全的Litespeed的教程了
- 10GB NVME SSD的litespeed高速免费的虚拟主机
- 不知道是不是错觉,感觉caddy 比nginx快